← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4080/2017disposed

Satto Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4080 of 2017 =========================================================== Satto Chaupal, S/o late Mahendra Chaupal, Resident of Village- Howidih, P.S. Baheri, Distt. Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Darbhanga.

3. The Block Development Officer, Baheri Block, Distt. Darbhanga.

4. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Baheri, Distt. Darbhanga.

5. The Superintendent of Education, Darbhanga.

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Darbhanga.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Hawidih Madhya Under, Block Baheri, Distt. Darbhanga.

8. The Mukhia of Gram Panchayat, Hawidih Madhya, Under Block Baheri, Distt. Darbhanga.

9. Ram Binod Mahto, resident of Village + Post Rohar, Via Benipur, Distt. Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has sought direction for his appointment pursuant to selection process of the year 2008. In the meanwhile, the Rule has undergone a change. Now under the amended Rule, passing of TET examination is the eligibility for consideration for selection and unless a candidate passes the TET examination, he does not come within the zone of consideration for selection of Panchayat Teacher. In view of the subsequent change in the Rule, no

Patna High Court CWJC No.4080 of 2017 dt.06-12-2017 2/2 relief can be granted to the petitioner. In case, the respondents undertake fresh selection process, the petitioner, if otherwise is eligible, may apply and his case may be considered in accordance with the existing Rule.

With the aforesaid, this application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14.12.2017 Transmission Date NA