Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4800 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2024 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Chandan Yadav, S/O Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar Resident of VillageMadhopatti, PS -Kamtaul, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP Sri Rabindra Kumar for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant bail application has been filed in terms of the liberty granted to the petitioner by an order dated 21.09.2004 in Cr. Misc. No.37704 of 2024 to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

4. Th learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that charges against the petitioner has been framed on 26.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4800 of 2025(2) dt.19-03-2025 2/2 counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Darbhanga in connection with Sessions Trial No.469 of 2024 arising out of Kamtaul P. S. Case No.08 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. The learned trial Court before releasing the petitioner on bail shall verify as to whether charges against the petitioner has been framed or not and in the event, if it is found that charges have not been framed against the petitioner, in that event, the present order shall not be given effect to, but if charges have been framed, the petitioner shall be released forthwith.

9. It is further made clear that if the learned trial Court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial Court shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons and shall take all coercive steps to ensure that petitioner is behind bar. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T