Sandeep Kumar Chaudhari @ Sandeep Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9051 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -546 Year- 2015 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sandeep Kumar Chaudhari @ Sandeep Chaudhari son of Late Kalika Chaudhari resident of village - Habbupur, Police Station - Rajpur, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s Mr. Neerad Parashar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dihri Town P.S. Case No. 546 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1B)A and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, from Indigo vehicle which was being driven by the petitioner, one country made pistol, three cartridges and other articles were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances, nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, he has been made victim of the police atrocity and, as such, the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9051 of 2016 (3) dt.26-04-2016 2/2 deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery, the petitioner shall be released on bail after completion of six months in custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Rohtas in connection with Dihri Town P.S. Case No. 546 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T