← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./411/2018withdrawn

Kanchan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.411 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20806 of 2010 ====================================================== Kanchan Kumari Wife of Sri Ramnath Chaurasia, Resident of Village- Sahith, P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 5.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

6.

The Subdivisional Officer, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Vidyapatinagar Block, DistrictSamastipur. 8.

The Child Development Project Officer, Vidyapatinagar, DistrictSamastipur. 9.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Samastipur. 10.

The Gram panchayat Raj, Sahith through the Panchayat Secretary, P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District- Sam 11.

The Mukhiya-cum-Chairman of the Selection Committee of Aganbari Sevika/Sahaika, Grampanchayat Raj, 12.

The District Magistrate Social Welfare Officer, Samastipur. 13.

The District Programme Officer, Samastipur.

14.

Anju Devi, Wife of Sri Uday Chaurasia, Resident of Village- Sahith, P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Basant Kumar Tripathy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha Ga 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2019 After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the present review petition stands

Patna High Court C. REV. No.411 of 2018(4) dt.10-07-2019 2/2 dismissed as withdrawn. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge any order affecting her rights, if not already challenged.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U