Rohit Kumar Thakur @ Anki @ Ainki v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10043 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Thakur @ Anki @ Ainki S/O Dinanath Thakur MohallaNakhash Chok, Andarkila, PS- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 392, 411, 413, 414, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that three miscreants looted the mobile phone and motorcycle of the informant on gun point.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation only on the basis of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10043 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 suspicion. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle which is alleged to have been recovered from this petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2024 and has two criminal antecedents. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64787 of 2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10043 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T