Lallu Nonia @ Lalu Noniya @ Lalu @ Lallu Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5941 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-490 Year-2023 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Lallu Nonia @ Lalu Noniya @ Lalu @ Lallu Chauhan Son of Shiv Nandan Noniya R/o Village - Kulharia, P.S. - Koilwar, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, who is none else than own brother of husband of the informant, in an inebriated condition, pushed husband of informant due to which he fell from the roof and succumbed to the injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5941 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 motive. As a matter of fact, the deceased himself fell from the roof accidentally and succumbed to the injuries. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 17.06.2025.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation of that he pushed husband of the informant from the roof due to which he fell from roof and died. Petitioner is assailant of the deceased.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is rejected.
7. However, considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T