Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3211 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2022 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV Son of Ram Sevak Yadav @ Bhutai Yadav Resident of Village- Chiknautwa (Chiknotba), P.S.- Ladaniya, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that victim is a matured girl, who is aged about 21 years. There is no eye-witness to show petitioner has involved in the said occurrence. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.10.2022. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3211 of 2023(3) dt.21-06-2023 2/2 victim girl has recovered and her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she stated that the petitioner taken away her in a Car, thereafter kept her in a house and committed rape upon her and when she protested, the petitioner assaulted to her. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T