← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2351/2017disposed

Md. Alauddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-15Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2351 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Alauddin, son of Md. Moharram, resident of Village- Jagdishpur, Police Station- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Programmed Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Block Education Officer, Sahebganj, Muzaffarpur.

6. The School Inspector, Town Area, Muzaffarpur.

7. The Headmaster, Uttkramit Middle School, Jagdishpur, Sahebganj, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar- GP17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was an applicant for appointment of Talimi Markaj but in the selection, irregularity was committed by the respondents. He submits that he has approached various authorities for redressal of the grievance and for rectifying the mistake/irregularity committed in the selection but no action was taken by the authorities concerned. He submits that writ petition may be disposed of with direction to the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur who shall cause an enquiry into the irregularity

Patna High Court CWJC No.2351 of 2017(3) dt.15-03-2018 2/2 committed in the matter of 'Tolasewak' and in case, manipulation and irregularity is found in the selection, corrective measure will be taken by the respondent District Magistrate.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file representation alongwith a copy of this order before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur who shall cause an inquiry into the allegation made with regard to illegality and manipulation in the selection of Talimi Markaj and in case he finds illegality, he would pass appropriate order/direction for rectifying the mistake as corrective measures. The entire exercise in this regard must be taken by the respondent District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U