Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5061/2024bail rejected

Rakesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-09Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5061 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2020 Thana- CHIKSAUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Rakesh Paswan S/o Manager Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PENDAPUR, POLICE STATION - HILSA, DISTRICT - NALANDA 2.

Manna Paswan S/o Tuntuni Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PENDAPUR, POLICE STATION - HILSA, DISTRICT - NALANDA 3.

Dhirendra Paswan S/o Mangru Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PENDAPUR, POLICE STATION - HILSA, DISTRICT - NALANDA 4.

Bipin Paswan S/o Jethan Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PENDAPUR, POLICE STATION - HILSA, DISTRICT - NALANDA 5.

Rahul Kumar S/o Karu Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PENDAPUR, POLICE STATION - HILSA, DISTRICT - NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bishwa Bijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Chiksaura P.S. Case No. 22 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and other co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's father and the dead body was thrown in the khanda.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5061 of 2024(4) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners no. 1 to 3 and 5 have got no criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner no. 4 has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the involvement of the petitioners were found in the killing of the informant's father mentioned in impugned order.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am of the view that no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out and the same is rejected with direction to the petitioners to surrender before the court below concerned within six weeks from today and pray for regular bail and the learned Court below may consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners in accordance with law and on its merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T