Rubi Kumari And ANR v. The Vigilance Department, Bihar ,Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7467 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -233 Year- 2016 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Rubi Kumari, daughter of Babua Narayan Paswan @ Babua Paswan

2. Madhu Kishore Paswan @ Madhu Kishor Paswan, son of Babua Narayan Paswan @ Babua Paswan.

Both resident of village-Parmanandpur, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Vigilance Department, Bihar ,patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mansi P.S. Case No.233 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 204, 420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that allegation against the petitioner is that by increasing their marks they got appointment as a contract teacher. However, later on, the same was detected and as soon as the same was detected they stopped working in the school. The petitioner no.1 is lady and, as such, anticipatory bail may be granted to them and they are ready to abide by any conditions imposed on them.

Heard learned counsel for the Vigilance also, who has opposed the prayer for bail by stating that general amnesty was earlier

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7467 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 given to the petitioners, but the petitioners have not availed of the same.

Having heard both sides. In view of the facts, as stated above, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks and make prayer for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit and also considering the materials available on the record and considering the fact the petitioner no.1 is lady, the learned court below shall dispose of the prayer for bail of the petitioners without being prejudiced by this order. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Arvind/- U T