Jagpatiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2521 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Jagpatiya Devi, Wife of Late Lakhindra Rai R/O Vill.- Pindauta Khurd, P.S.- Tisiauta, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506, 302 and 34 of the I.P.C.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and is a woman and the informant alleges that on 05.06.2024 at 8.00 P.M., Matuk Rai was piling the pillar on his land, on protest, Matuk abused and called Bipin Rai and ordered to kill the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2521 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/3 informant, on which Bipin assaulted him by farsa causing injury on head. Further, when his family members came to save him, accused Jagarnath along with other named accused persons and ten unknown accused came variously armed and assaulted Mithilesh, Anil and Sanjania Devi causing injury on head and Matuk also assaulted Sanjania by lathi causing fracture of her hand and snatched her chain.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that even allegations are not specific against the petitioner and on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2521 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P. S. Case No.59 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T