Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4955/2015bail granted

Gumani Rai @ Gumasta Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-05Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4955 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2013 Thana -CHAKIA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Gumani Rai @ Gumasta Rai Son of Baiju Rai Resident of vill-Chhota Khursheda,P.S-Sahebgang,Distt.-Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party : Mr. Anil Pd. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-02-2015 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 15.10.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the I.P.C and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Accusation is committing dacoity in the house of the informant. The name of the petitioner sprang up on confession of the co-accused.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on T.I.P. A statement to that effect has been made in para 9 and 11 of the petition. It is further submitted that other co-accused have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 39220 of 2014 and Cr. Misc. No. 7903 of 2014.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4955 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 41 of 2013.

Since the petitioner is accused in three other cases, let learned Court below cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if the petitioner gets substantially involved in similar nature of offence or defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T