Mukul Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3539 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-788 Year-2021 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== MUKUL KUMAR DAS SON OF HARENDRA NATH DAS R/O VILLAGEKAMALPOKHAR, P.S.- BALRAMPUR (TELTA O.P.), DISTRICTKATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

MAMTA DEVI WIFE OF MUKUL KUMAR DAS, D/O HARI PRASAD DAS R/O VILLAGE- RAUTARA, P.S.- BALRAMPUR (TELTA O.P.), DISTRICT- KATIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, Addl. Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498(A), of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with other family members committed torture on the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner while denying the allegations, submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case because he is husband of the victim.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3539 of 2023(2) dt.09-05-2023 2/2 However, he is ready to keep the victim to her matrimonial house with honour and dignity. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let this petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case no 788 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T