Bipin Sharma @ Bhushan Shama @ Bipin Ji v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3193 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Bipin Sharma @ Bhushan Shama @ Bipin Ji S/O Late Ragho Singh @ Radho Singh R/O Village- Chabura, P.S- Anti, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari For the State :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 386, 435, 379 of the IPC under Sections 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 38, 40 of UAP Act and Sections 17 of C.L.A, Act.
3. As per prosecution case, about 20 miscreants attacked the construction site of the company of the informant which was engaged in construction of a rail bridge and set on fire a number of equipments including the truck tippers, Excavator, Hydra, Sumo vehicle, a motorcycle and Tata P & H Crane. The miscreants also threatened the employees present there at the gunpoint and assaulted them and took away their
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3193 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026 2/3 mobile phones and cash amounting to Rs.50,000/- from individual workers. The name of the petitioner transpired as one of the miscreants during investigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He was not arrested at the spot and nothing was recovered from his possession. His name has figured only in the confessional statement of coaccused Kamlesh Ram @ Kamlesh Khar @ Kamlesh Chandravanshi. He has further submitted that till date, no TIP has been conducted and other co-accused persons have been granted bail.
5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3193 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026 3/3 required by the court.
7. Before accepting the bail bond, the learned court below shall verify whether any incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner or not. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T