Mohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4553 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2025 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Mohit Kumar Son of Pankaj Singh @ Late Vimal Singh R/o Village - Nimrang, P.S. - Jamui, Dist. - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanju Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 223, 196, 299, 125(A), 125(B) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that during immersion of Lord Ganesha, member of two communities created ruckus and even pelted stones against each other on account of which law and order situation had arisen and after great difficulties the idol was immersed and the accused persons were identified based on the video footage and by the local people. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4553 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that it would manifest that allegation of creating ruckus and assaulting is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner resides nearby the place of occurrence and thus on hearing ruckus came to the place of occurrence and might have been videographed but then it is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and is a person with clean antecedent.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 485 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T