Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3641 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2021 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== PRAKASH YADAV S/O VIRENDR YADAV, R/o village- Gunsagar, P.S.- Teterhat, District- Lakhisari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajnish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-08-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 88 of 2021 registered for offence punishable under section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The police got an information that the present petitioner along with co-accused Vikash Yadav had concealed a stolen motor cycle. On raid, the accused persons became successful in fleeing away. The Chowkidar apprised the name of the petitioner to the police personnel.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot and nothing was recovered from his possession, rather the motor cycle was recovered from near the house of Nawal Sah. He has also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3641 of 2022(2) dt.10-08-2022 2/2 submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Lakhisarai in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 88 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

The learned court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it comes to the notice that the petitioner has criminal antecedent, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T