Rambriksh Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3999 of 2017 ====================================================== Rambriksh Singh S/o late Raghunadan Singh R/o Village- Jath Toli, Ward No. 15, Purani Sahar, P.S.- Daudnagar, Distt- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Road Construction Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. District Magistrate Cum Collector , Aurangabad.

3. Deputy Collector land Reforms, Daudnagar, Distt- Aurangabad.

4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Daudnagar, Distt- Aurangabad.

5. Circle Officer, Daudnagar, Distt- Aurangabad.

6. Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, Patna through its Mananging Director.

7. Senior Project Engineer, Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Ltd. Work Division, Gaya.

8. Ramkrit Singh

9. Rameshwar Prasad Singh both S/o late Raghunandan Singh

10. Most. Jageshwari Devi W/o late Chandrika Singh@ Chanarik Singh

11. Vijay Singh

12. Ajay Singh

13. Vinay Singh

14. Yugal Singh

15. Sanjay Singh All S/o late Chandrika Singh @ Chanarik Singh

16. Shanti Devi D/o late Chandrika Singh @ Chanarik Singh All R/o Muhalla- Jath Toli, Ward No. 15, Purnai Sahar, P.O. +P.S.- Daudnagar, Distt- Aurangabad.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Chandra Bhaskar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav, AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 This matter has been listed out of turn on the basis of mentioning slip filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard the parties.

The petitioner has sought relief for issuance of direction to the concerned authorities to make payment of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3999 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 compensation for the land acquired for the purpose of constructing approach road to a bridge on Sone river according to the respective share of the petitioner and respondents no. 9 to 16 and in alternative to hold payment of compensation amount till disposal of Partition Suit No. 292 of 2016 pending in the court of Sub Judge-1st, Aurangabad.

In my view, petitioner should raise his grievance before the competent authorities and this court does not feel it proper to issue any direction to the concerned authorities. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of giving liberty to petitioner to raise his grievance before the appropriate forum.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U