Arjun Trivedi v. The Food Corporation Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2052 of 2017 ====================================================== Arjun Trivedi, Son of Late Rajeshwar Trivedi, Resident of VillageJamshari, P.O.- Jamshari, P.S.- Bind, District- Nalanda at present residing at Mohallah- Shivpuri, Road No.1A, House No.3, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Food Corporation of India through its Managing Director, New Delhi.
2. The Executive Director (East), Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office (East), 10A, Middleton Row, Kolkata- 700071.
3. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer, 3rd & 4th Floor, Arunachal Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.
4. The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer, 3rd & 4th Floor, Arunachal Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.
5. The Assistant General Manager (Personnel)/Pension, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.
6. The Manager (Pension), Food Corporation of India, District Office, Digha Ghat, Patna- 800011.
7. The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Firdaus Building, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.
8. The Union of India, Department of Food and Civil Supplies through its Secretary Government of India, New Delhi.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal, Advocate Mr. Tuhin Shankar, C.G.C.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Food Corporation of India and Union of India (respondent no. 8).
2. Pursuant to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the concerned respondents, it transpires that as of now the admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid and with regard to
Patna High Court CWJC No.2052 of 2017 (5) dt.15-01-2018 2/2 Gratuity, the matter is sub-judice as the order on which the petitioner relies is under challenge by the Food Corporation of India in C.W.J.C. No. 18110 of 2017 and with regard to promotional benefits, a separate writ petition filed by the petitioner being C.W.J.C. No. 10053 of 2017, is also pending.
3. In view thereof, except for the above two benefits, the rest having been paid, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition and accordingly, the same stands disposed off. However, the issue of gratuity and promotional benefits shall be subject to the outcome of the aforesaid two pending writ petitions.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U