← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./425/2018disposed

The State Of Bihar And ORS v. Sanjeet Kumar Sinha And ORS

2019-04-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.425 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3542 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

The State Of Bihar through its Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Mass Education, Education Depatment, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sanjeet Kumar Sinha and Ors S/o- Late Shiv Narayan Prasad Srivastava, Resident of Village- Balua Tal Azad Nagar, P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran.

2.

Kumari Nijaya, W/o- Mani Bhushan Kishor, Resident of Village- Kalu Pakar, P.O.- Kalu Pakar, P.S.- Phenhara, Block- Pakridayal, District- East Champaran Bihar.

3.

Tara Kumari, D/o- Pawan Kumar Prasad, W/o- Late Sanjay Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Mohmadpur, Panchayat, Divapur, P.O.- Jhitkahi, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran Bihar.

4.

Pramod Bhagat, S/o- Khanaya Bhagat, Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, P.O.- Motihari, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran. 5.

Din Bandhu Kumar, S/o- Rabi Shankar Kumar, Resident of VillageMahamada, P.O.- Barka Balua, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran. 6.

Sunil Kumar, S/o- Giriya Yadav, Resident of Village- Kakadiya Tola, P.O.- Kumwa, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.

7.

Nageshwari Vidharthii, S/o- Mahendra Singh, Resident of Village- Bhdhan Talli, P.O.- Bhabhana, District- Jehanabad.

8.

Dina Nath Prasad, S/o- Mathura Sah, Resident of Village- Lachhanauta, P.O.- Lachhanauta, P.S.- Gaunaha, District- West Champaran. 9.

Arun Kumar Sharma @ Arun Kumar Sharma, S/o- Kailash Sharma, Resident of Village- Lachhanauta, P.O.- Lachhanauta, P.S.- Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

10.

Gautam Kumar Yadav, S/o- Jagdish Prasad, Resident of Village- Thikpura, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Purnea.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Ac To Ga 12 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Patna High Court C. REV. No.425 of 2018(3) dt.17-04-2019 2/3 ORAL ORDER 17-04-2019 Since the order under review was passed with consent of the parties, no interference is required in the present case, however, it has been pointed out that the Judgment passed by the learned Division Bench in LPA No. 1047 of 2017, on the basis whereof the original writ petition was disposed of, has been modified by a Judgment of the learned Division Bench dated 27.06.2018 passed in Civil Review No. 59 of 2018 by which it has been directed that the matter be listed after passing of the order by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (C) No. ...... of 2017 (Diary No. 25804 of 2017).

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-The State of Bihar, the order dated 15.03.2018 passed in CWJC No. 4249 of 2018 is modified to the extent that the same would abide by the final decision to be rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP(C) No. ... of 2017 (Diary No. 25804 of 2017).

In view of the fact that the judgment passed by the learned Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 1047 of 2017, which was the basis for disposing of the original writ petition, has been modified by the learned Division Bench by a judgment dated 27.06.2018 passed in Civil Review No. 59 of 2018, the consequences have to follow, hence, there is no need of issuing

Patna High Court C. REV. No.425 of 2018(3) dt.17-04-2019 3/3 notice to the private respondent and the matter is now required to be governed by the judgment to be rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP ( C) No. ......... of 2017 (Diary No. 25804 of 2017) as well as by the final outcome of Civil Review No. 59 of 2018, which is pending adjudication before a learned Division Bench of this Court.

The present review petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U