Rajaram Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3817 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2021 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAJARAM CHAUDHARY Son of Late Jagdish Chaudhary Resident of Village- Ahuri, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya.

2.

Dewanti Devi @ Girja Devi W/o Kail Chaudhary @ Kail Chaudhari Resident of Village- Ahuri, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Amas P.S. Case No. 293/2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(a)/30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3817 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2022 2/2 rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable., (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T