← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2961/2025bail granted

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2961 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2024 Thana- BICHKODWA District- Jamui ====================================================== Manoj Yadav S/o- Late Chito Yadav Village-Salaiyatrn, P.S. Bichkodwa, District-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons started cutting rod of the informant from his land, on objection, Ashok assaulted him by Gaita twice causing injury on head, while Gita and other female accused held the hand of the informant, thereafter Yugal, Rajendra and Chaitu caught his younger brother while petitioner assaulted him by axe causing injury on head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2961 of 2025(4) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both side assaulted each other. It is next submitted that no doubt the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted with axe causing injury on head of the brother of the informant but then the blow was not repeated and the injury opined to be simple.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bichkodwa P.S. Case No.31/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T