Bankatesh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3902 of 2016 ==============================================
1. Bankatesh Kumar, Son of Raghubansh Singh resident of Village + P.O. + P.S. Konch, District Gaya.
2. Manju Kumari wife of Mahesh Kumar Resident of Village - Derhgaon, PS - Kashichak, District - Nawada.
3. Neha Kumari, Wife of Subodh Pandit resident of village - Baliyari PS - Pakaribarawan, District Nawada.
4. Nawal Pandit, Son of Basudeo Pandit resident of village - Thelpash, PS - Pakaribarawan, District Nawada.
5. Uttam Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Rajendra Chaudhary resident of village - Chhatrawa, PS - Pakarbarawan, District Nawada.
6. Rambilash Paswan, Son of Nagina Paswan resident of village - Hanuman Bigha, PS - Kashichak, District Nawada.
7. Anamika Kumari, Wife of Late Ramchandra Verma resident of village - Gopalpur PS - Warsaliganj, District - Nawada. .... .... Petitioners.
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Nawada.
5. The District Education Officer, Nawada.
6. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Nawada.
7. The Block Development Officer, Kashi Chak, Block District - Nawada.
8. The Block Education Officer, Kashi Chak Block District Nawada.
9. The Mukhiya, Khakhari Gram Panchayat, Kashi Chak Block District - Nawada.
10. The Panchayat Secretary, Khakhari Gram Panchayat Kashi Chak Block District - Nawada. .... .... Respondents. ============================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. A. Bhusha, AC to GP-17. ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.3902 of 2016 (2) dt.03-03-2017
02. 03-03-2017 After some argument, Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this application to move before the State Appellate Authority.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) Vikash/- U