← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19659/2018disposed

Manvendra Kumar Tripathy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-23Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19659 of 2018 ====================================================== Manvendra Kumar Tripathy Son of Late Kailash Tripathy, Resident of Village Bharwalia, P.O. Mohadi Nain, P.S.- Maghwalia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 4.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Gaunaha, West Champaran. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravish Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay- GA 5 Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, AC to GA 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the Summer Vacations as the learned Counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.

The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 8th May, 2019, published prior to the Vacation. The matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the Court for disposal of the matter.

For various dues on account of arrears of salary, group insurance, benefit of second ACP and fixation of pension, it is submitted that the petitioner has approached respondent No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19659 of 2018(2) dt.23-05-2019 2/2

5. The petitioner would be satisfied if his representation dated 10.2.2016 (Annexure 1 series) is disposed of. In view of the limited grievance, respondent No. 5 is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure 1 series) by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. It is made clear that if any dues are found admissible the same should be paid to the petitioner expeditiously and without any undue delay. Let the entire exercise be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

The writ petite stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U