Dipu Kumar @ Pradeep Yadav @ Deepu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6618 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- SILAO District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dipu Kumar @ Pradeep Yadav @ Deepu Yadav Son of Dhanesh Gop R/o Village- Madhuban P.S.- Nardiganj, District -Nawada at present Village -Raghubigha P.O.- Sabbait and District -Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate Ms. Kumar Sonal Advocate Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Heard Mr. Ankit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 379, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, on 13.03.2024, while informant, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty, in the meantime, this petitioner, along with other accused persons assaulted informant and police party by means of lathi and danda. It is further alleged that all the accused persons also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6618 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 2/2 damaged the police vehicle.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific and direct accusation that all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including this petitioner attacked police personnel and also damaged the police vehicle.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T