Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2140 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak Sah S/O Baij Nath Sah @ Chhotu Sah R/O Village- Khajauli Bazar, Maniyarva, Inarwa, P.S.- Khajauli, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Prakash Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2025 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 58827 of 2024 and the same was permitted to be withdrawn by an order dated 4-10-2024 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2140 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2025 2/2 charges against the petitioner have been framed on 9-12-2024 (Annexure-3).
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6.
Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 4 of 2023.
7.
However, if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T