Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2306/2025rejected

Anuj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-09Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2306 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- TELMAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Anuj Kumar S/o Late Anil Mahto Resident of Village - Soradih, P.S. - Telmar, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the informant :

Mr. Samay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Telmar P.S Case No. 12 of 2024 from the Court of learned A.C.J.M-I, Bihar Sharif at Nalanda registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 332, 324, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the I.P.C and 25 (1-b) a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is alleged that the petitioner has fired bullet on the husband of the informant due to which husband of the informant sustained injury and lateron he succumbed to death.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2306 of 2025(3) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.04.2024.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and case diary, it appears that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to fired bullet on the stomach of the deceased. Witnesses also supported the version of the prosecution. From perusal of postmortem report, it appears cause of the death of the deceased is due to firearm injury and bullet also found inside the body of the deceased after dissection.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T