Gurudeo Jha v. Dipak Kumar Singh, Additional Chief Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.152 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10971 of 2024 ====================================================== Gurudeo Jha S/o Late Ganesh Jha Resident of Village- Khajuri, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur (Balwahat O.P.), District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Dipak Kumar Singh, Additional Chief Secretary (Principal Secretary), Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Vaibhav Chaudahry, District Magistrate, Saharsa. 3.
Anisha Singh, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Simri Bakhtiyarpur, DistrictSaharsa. 4.
Shubham Verma, Circle Officer, Simri, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. 5.
Himanshu, Superintendent of Police, Saharsa.
6.
Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa.
7.
Kulwant Kumar, Officer-In-Charge, Balwahatt O.P., P.S. - Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa.
8.
Subodh Kumar, Officer-IN-Charge, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, P.S. DistrictSaharsa. 9.
Gautam Ray Son of Late Jagdish Ray R/o Village-Khajuri, P.S.-Simri Bakhtiyarpur (Balwohatt OP), District-Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Government Pleader 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2026 No one appears on behalf of petitioner, however, learned counsel for the State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
"1. That this application is being filed for issuance of rule of contempt against the opposite parties for suitably convict them for
Patna High Court MJC No.152 of 2025(4) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 disobeying the order dt. 25.07.2024 passed in CWJC No. 10971 of 2024 by Ho'ble Mr.
Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra, which was disposed of with direction/order on behalf of the petitioner to dispose of the representation dated 03.06.2024 filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order."
3. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the State, referring to paragraph no. 6 of the show-cause submits that the order of this Court has been complied.
4. Considering the aforesaid, it appears that opposite parties have complied the order of this Court.
5. In view of the above, the contempt application stands disposed of.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U