Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19666 of 2018 ====================================================== Saroj Devi Wife of Sri Ram Ashish Paswan, Resident of Village+ Post OfficePadariya, Police Station- Chutiya, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.) Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Deputy Director, Department of Welfare, Patna Division, Patna, Bihar. 4.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Nauhatta, District- Rohtas. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Nauhatta, Police Station- Nauhatta, District- Rohtas.

8.

The Chairman/Ward Member, Sevika Sahayika Selection Committee Anganbari Centre Padariya, Ward NO. 4 under Tiura Gram Panchayat, Police Station- Chutiya, District- Rohtas.

9.

The Up-Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Tiura, Police Station- Chutiya, DistrictRohtas. 10.

The Selection Committee of Anganbari Centre Padariya, Ward No. 4, under Gram Panchayat Tiura through its Secretary, Police Station-Chutiya, District- Rohtas.

11.

Ranju Devi, Wife of Uday Paswan, Resident of Village + Post OfficePadariya, Police Station- Chutiya, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present.

2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner summits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition as

Patna High Court CWJC No.19666 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 the final order has not been passed by the appellate authority. As such, he seeks permission to pursue the matter before the appellate authority.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U