Ranjit @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8833 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -264 Year- 2014 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Ranjit @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Indrajeet Kumar Son of Sri Suresh Paswan resident of village- Jagpura, P.S- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Varma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ansuaiya Jaiswal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 25 (1-b), 9/26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, acting on a tip off raid was conducted and then three culprits managed to flee away but the petitioner and coaccused Rajesh Paswan was apprehended and they disclosed the names of their associates and from possession of the petitioner a loaded pistol with six cartridges of 7.65 bore and other live cartridges of 315 bore were recovered, whereas, from possession of co-accused also one loaded country made pistol along with two cartridges and a mobile set were recovered, as per seizure list. Submission is of false implication and that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8833 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015 2/2 petitioner has got only one case in his credit which is related with this case and he is suffering in custody since 24.09.2014, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

Considering the alleged recovery and custody of the petitioner now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Jehanabad in Ghosi P.S. Case No. 264 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T