← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10410/2022allowed

Reeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-02Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10410 of 2022 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10387 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2018 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

REETA DEVI W/o Police Mahto Resident of Village- Dhumnagar, P.S.- Baruraj, Dist- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Lalo Devi W/o- Raju Mahto Resident of Village- Dhumnagar, P.S.- Baruraj, Dist- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Rina Devi W/o Arun Mahto Resident of Village- Dhumnagar, P.S.- Baruraj, Dist- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kishor For the Opposite Party/ :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 This application has been filed for modification of order dated 23.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10387 of 2021 by which the petitioners have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that inadvertently in the prayer portion and paragraph No.-1 of the bail application name of the police station was wrongly typed as 'Bakhraj' which should have been read as 'Baruraj' and accordingly, the same has been incorporated in the order dated 23.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10387 of 2021.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the order dated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10410 of 2022(2) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 23.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10387 of 2021 is modified to the extent that in place of Bakhraj, it shall be read as Baruraj. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) SONALI/- U T