Jai Mangal Sah v. Ram Sogarath Sah

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1582 of 2018 ====================================================== Jai Mangal Sah Son of Late Bhagwat Sah, Resident of Village- Parsa, P.S. Bahlolpur, P.S. Pach Pakari (Dhaka) District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Ram Sogarath Sah Son of Late Jang Bahadur Sah, Resident of VillageParsa, P.O.-Bahlolpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran. 2.

Kiran Devi, Wife of Late Jitan Sah Resident of Village- Parsa, P.O.- Bhalalpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran. 3.

Chandan Kumar, Minor, Son of Late Jitan Sah Under the guardianship of his natural mother Kiran Devi, Resident of Village- Parsa, P.O.-Bhalalpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran.

4.

Kundan Kumar, Minor, Son of Late Jitan Sah Under the guardianship of his natural mother Kiran Devi, Resident of Village- Parsa, P.O.-Bhalalpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran.

5.

Khushbu Kumari, Daughter of Late Jitan Sah Under the guardianship of her natural mother Kiran Devi, Resident of Village- Parsa, P.O.-Bhalalpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran.

6.

Gita Kumari, Daughter of Late Jitan Sah Under the guardianship of her natural mother Kiran Devi, Resident of Village- Parsa, P.O.-Bhalalpur, P.S. Pach Pakari District- East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2023 Vide order dated 24.11.2023 learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to file requisites for issuance of notice upon the respondents within a week and it was made clear that in case of failure the petition would be dismissed and the case was adjourned for 01.12.2023.

2. Office note dated 30.11.2023 shows the requisites

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1582 of 2018(11) dt.05-12-2023 2/2 for issuance of notice have not been filed.

3. On 01.12.2023 no one appeared on behalf of the parties. It seems that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U