Md. Meraj Miyan @ Meraj Miyan @ Meraj Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11913 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Md. Meraj Miyan @ Meraj Miyan @ Meraj Miyan son of Butan Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 2.

Ayaj Miyan son of Butan Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 3.

Monaf Miya @ Monaf Alam @ Munav Miyan @ Munab Alam son of Butan Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 4.

Riyaj Miyan @ Riyaz Alam son of Butan Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 5.

Seraj Miyan @ Seraj Alam son of iralun Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 6.

Ainul Miya @ Ainul Haque @ Einul Miya @ Enul Haque son of Mismillah Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas 7.

Sonu Miyan @ Zafar Ali son of kaish Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, PsDinara, Dist- Rohtas 8.

Eraj Miya son of Ailuan Miyan Resident of village- Karanj, Ps- Dinara, Dist- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 74, 190, 191(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11913 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026 2/3

3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., all the accused persons including the petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and her family members causing them injury, snatched the golden ear ring of the informant and they also tried to outrage her modesty.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The allegation levelled against the petitioners are general and omnibus. Both the parties are co-villagers. The injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the serious nature of allegation, as well as, criminal antecedent of the petitioner nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7 on prearrest bail.

7. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 8 to be general and omnibus, they are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11913 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026 3/3 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class. Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

8. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

9. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T