Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4732/2026bail granted

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-06Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4732 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-630 Year-2025 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Pramod Kumar, S/O Lalo Manjhi, Resident of Village- Basu Tand, P.S.- Wazir Ganj, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Wazir Ganj P.S. Case No. 630 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(i), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the house of co-accused Urmila Devi, arms were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Co-accused Urmila Devi has named this petitioner and in the F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner is only that he involved in supply of arms. Nothing has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4732 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 his conscious possession rather recovery has been made from the possession of one co-accused Urmila Devi. It has also been submitted that co-accused Urmila Devi has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 84064 of 2025. the case of this petitioner stands on better footing. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Wazir Ganj P.S. Case No. 630 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T