Sonelal Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11615 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2015 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Sonelal Ram son of Jaleshwar Ram resident of Village- Sawareji, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 307 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner with an intention to kill the informant assaulted her by knife repeatedly on her person resulting she became unconscious and regained her senses after five days of the occurrence in the I.C.U. of Arogyam Hospital, Patna. The petitioner is the Devar of the informant.

Submission is of false implication and that due to partitioning the property there was enmity and the petitioner has been implicated, the fardbeyan has been recorded after five days of the occurrence under the planned manner, the petitioner is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11615 of 2016 (3) dt.10-05-2016 2/2 suffering in custody since 25.06.2015 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner assaulted the informant with knife repeatedly with an intention to kill her and five injuries have been found which are grievous in nature caused by the sharp knife and the injuries are on the vital parts.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 179 of 2015 pending in the court of C.J.M. Gopalganj.

However, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T