← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2711/2017disposed

Ajit Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-12Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.2711 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2711 of 2017 With IA No.8638 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Ajit Kumar, son of Sri Chandramohan Srivastava, resident of Block Road, Chota Pareuba, Ward No. 18, Raxaul, East Champaran, Bihar.

2. Pankaj Kumar Singh son of Late Nawal Kishore Singh, resident of Kali Mandir Road, Kali Nagri, Ward No. 11, Raxaul, East Champaran.

3. Himanshu Ranjan, son of Ramesh Kumar Singh, resident of Block Road, Chhota Pareuba, Ward No. 18, Raxaul, East Champaran, Bihar.

4. Baiju Jaiswal, son of Late Mohan Lal, resident of Rice Market, Ward no. 21, Raxaul, East Champaran.

5. Sagar Gupta, son of Late Nawal Kishore Gupta, Main Road, Koriya Tola, Ward No. 24, Raxaul, East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Municipal Corporation, Raxaul through its Executive Officer, Raxaul.

5. The Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Raxaul. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Counsel for the parties are present.

The matter has been listed at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioners who seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition in the light of the decision taken by the Board of the Nagar Parishad, Raxaul brought on record through I.A. No.8638 of 2017 wherein inter alia, decision has been taken for regularization while also seeking leave to move in case the decision goes otherwise. The writ petition as well as the interlocutory application are accordingly disposed of together with the liberty so prayed. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U