Rahul Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2428 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Rahul Ranjan, Son of Late Surendra Prasad resident of Mohalla Paliroad, P.S.- Dehri District Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Mona Ranjan Daughter of Kharamdev Prasad resident of village Kashi Dih LIne No 1 Sakchi PS Jamshedpur District East Champaran Singhbhum (Jharkhand) ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 78/18, disclosing offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be husband of the informant and allegation against him is of torture and cruelty to the informant in connection with demand of dowry and it further appears that earlier also, a case was filed, which was compromised but later on the petitioner again assaulted her and ousted form the house. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on notice, the informant had appeared before the court below, where she refused to live with the petitioner. It has further been submitted that a maintenance case has also been filed by the informant at Jamshedpur, which is at final stage and the next date is fixed on 12.03.2019. Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2428 of 2019(3) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 informant, they have opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that uptil now not a single farthing has been given by the petitioner and due to which she is unable to get her daughter admitted in the school.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 78/18, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is further subject to the condition that petitioner will pay Rs. 10,000/- to the informant as lump sump for admission of her daughter in school and the petitioner shall also abide by interim order or final order passed in the above maintenance case, otherwise, the informant will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T