← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3200/2026bail granted

Deelip Ram @ Deelip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-19Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3200 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2025 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Deelip Ram @ Deelip Kumar S/O Kanhaiya Ram R/O Village- Pithauri, P.SBaniyapur, Distt.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 393 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 90 litres of liquor along with gas cylinder, iron furnace, big jar and drums were recovered near the bank of the river.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has no knowledge and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3200 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 concern with the alleged recovery. Learned counsel further submitted that the alleged recovery has been made from an open place which is accessible to public at large. Learned counsel further submitted that, prima-facie, no case is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the lower court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 393 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T