Abdul Wakil Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6781 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Abdul Wakil Ahmad Son of Late Pir Mohammad, Resident of villageSurajpur, P.O. Jivdhara, P.S. Pipra Kothi, District East Champaran at Motihari, Presently working as Keyman-cum- Chowkidar, Public Health Sub- Division, Chakiya, District- East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3. The Engineer-in- Chief-cum- Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Motihari. null null
6. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division Dhaka, District- East Champaran.
7. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Sub- Division, Chakiya, DistrictEast Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal-Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case for grant of A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. has already been recommended by the authorities hence, the authorities may be directed to consider his representation regarding his grievance. It is directed that the petitioner should file a representation regarding non-grant of A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. before the respondents no. 2 and 3 within two weeks from today and in
Patna High Court CWJC No.6781 of 2017 (2) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 case, such representation is filed before the respondents no. 2 and 3, the same should be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks keeping in view the order dated 07.12.2017 passed by the respondent no. 3 in the case of similarly situated persons.
The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U