← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1954/2020disposed

Niraj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1954 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2018 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== NIRAJ KUMAR YADAV Son of Late Fuldeo Yadav @ Phul Dev Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Maghual, P.S.- Pandaul, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 386 of 2019 arising out of Pandaul P.S. Case No. 210 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 304 of the Indian Penal Code. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned court below be directed to expedite the trial and in case, the trial is not concluded and no substantial progress is made therein, the petitioner be granted liberty to approach this Court after a lapse of one year from today, for the purposes of renewal of his prayer for regular bail.

At this Juncture, it is brought to the notice of this Court that charges have already been framed in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1954 of 2020(3) dt.20-03-2020 2/2 case.

Having regard to the short submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to direct the learned court of ADJ IV, Madhubani in connection with Sessions Trial No. 386 of 2019, arising out of Pandaul P.S.Case No. 210 of 2018, to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of twelve months from today. It is needless to state that in case, either no progress is made in the ongoing trial or the trial is not concluded within a period of twelve months from today, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for regular bail before this Court.

The present petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions and liberty to the petitioner. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T