Geeta Devi @ Rita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5540 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2022 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Geeta Devi @ Rita Devi Wife Of Late Raju Saw Resident Of Village - Deo Kuli, Bind Toli, P.S.- Bihta, Distt.- Patna.

2.

Rinki Devi Daughter Of Late Raju Saw Resident Of Village - Dost Nagar, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

3.

Bheem Saw Son Of Rajendra Saw Son In Law Of Late Raju Saw, Resident Of Village - Dost Nagar, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna. 4.

Chotu Saw @ Chotu Son Of Ram Prasad Saw Resident Of Village - Dost Nagar, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

5.

Sunaina Devi Wife Of Sri Chotu Saw Resident Of Village - Dost Nagar, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioners are the family members of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5540 of 2023(2) dt.10-04-2023 2/2 the husband of the deceased. He submits that husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 65 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T