Md. Naushad Ansari @ Naushad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2685 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2018 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Naushad Ansari @ Naushad Ansari, Age 22 yrs. Male, S/o Jameel Ansari, Resident of Village- Basmatiya, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Narpatganj (Basmatiya O.P.) P.S. Case No.233/2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of two stolen motorcycle from his premises.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., V, Araria in connection with Narpatganj (Basmatiya O.P.) P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2685 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 No.233/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T