Ahshana Begam @ Ashana Begam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5950 of 2024 ====================================================== Ahshana Begam @ Ashana Begam Wife of Shahid Alam Resident of VillageJhatibari, Ward No. 15, Panchayat- Bualdah, Block- Kochadhaman, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director I.C.D.S. Directorate Bihar, (Social Welfare Department), Patna.

2.

The Director I.C.D.S. Directorate, Bihar, Patna (Social Welfare Department). 3.

The District Magistrate-Cum-District Collector, Kishanganj. 4.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.) Kishanganj. 5.

The Child Development Project Officer Kochadhaman, Kishanganj. 6.

Mahila Observer Child Development Project, Kochadhaman, Kishanganj. 7.

Sahmila Kaushar Wife Abdul Qukaiyum, Resident of Jhatibari, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District - Kishanganj.

8.

Yasmin Khatoon, Wife of Sakil Ahmad, C/o Jhantivari Ward No. 15, Panchayat Bualdah, P.S. - Kochadhaman, District - Kisanganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 15.07.2023 passed by the learned District Magistrate-Cum-District Collector Kishanganj in Anganbari Appeal Case No. 123/2019 whereby and whereunder order dated 01.08.2019 passed in Anganbari Case No. 38/2018-19 as well as order dated 21.08.2021 passed in Anganbari Case No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5950 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2 01/2021-22 by the District Programme Officer, Kishanganj was set aside illegally without considering the material available on the record of the case."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U