Upendra Turi @ Upendra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3291 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Upendra Turi @ Upendra S/o Suresh Turi R/o Mohalla- Didwadi, near BCCL Guest House, Jealgora New Colony No. 7, P.S.- Jora Pakhar, Distt.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Suneil Kumar Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 385 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 4392 liters of illicit foreign liquor from the tank lorry bearing Regd. No. BR09H-4621. The petitioner was arrested on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3291 of 2025(3) dt.27-02-2025 2/3 The petitioner is the driver of the alleged vehicle and had no knowledge regarding the illicit liquor being kept on the same. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. There is a noncompliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 17.11.2024 without any rhymes or reason.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that huge amount of liquor has been recovered in this case.
6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 385 of 2024, subject to the following conditions;
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3291 of 2025(3) dt.27-02-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T