Karan Dhangar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13795 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2020 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna ====================================================== KARAN DHANGAR S/O RAJU DHANGAR R/O CHINA KOTHI, KATHPUL, P.S-BUDHA COLONY, DISTRICT-PATNA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deovind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Budha Colony P.S. Case No. 299 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Sections 272, 273 of Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. As per the prosecution case, 2 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from house of this petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. The house in question is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13795 of 2021(2) dt.30-06-2021 2/2 in joint possession of the family and he is in custody since 28.11.2020.

Considering the period of custody and quantity of recovered liquor, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Excise Act), Patna in connection with Budha Colony P.S. Case No. 299 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T