Abhilasha Kumari Sah @ Abhilasha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2093 of 2024 ====================================================== Abhilasha Kumari Sah @ Abhilasha Kumari Wife of Sri Shiv Shankar Sah, resident of village- Kunauli, Ward No. - 17, P.S. and Block - Nirmali, District - Supaul, Bihar - 847451.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Supaul.

5.

The District Programme Officer (ICDS), Supaul. 6.

The Child Development Programme Officer (CDPO), Nirmali. 7.

The Female Supervisor cum Member Secretary, Selection Committee, Ward No.- 17, Kunauli Panchayat, District- Supaul. 8.

Sanjan Kumari, Wife of Pradeep Kumar, resident of Village - Kunauli, Ward No. - 17, P.S. and Block - Nirmali, District - Supaul, Bihar - 847451. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar, AC to Ex-AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1.A) To issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari setting aside the order dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure

3) passed by the District Magistrate, Supaul (Respondent no-4) in Anganwari Appeal Case No10/2022 and 19/2022 whereby and whereunder he was pleased to dismiss Anganwari Appeal of Petitioner vide Appeal No- 10/2022 and at the same time allowed the appeal of Private Respondent vide

Patna High Court CWJC No.2093 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 Appeal No- 19/2022.

B) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U