Raghuvansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1702 of 2025 ====================================================== Raghuvansh Singh S/o Late Mahanand Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Abul Hasanpur, P.S.- Vaishali, Block- Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chief Election Officer, The Bihar State Election Authority, 32- Harding Road, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer of PACS, Vaishali at Hajipur.

5.

The District Development Commissioner-cum-Nodal Officer, PACS Election, Vaishali at Hajipur.

6.

The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Dy. Election Officer, Hajipur. 7.

The District Co-operative Officer-cum-Dy. Election Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

8.

The Block Development Officer-cum-PACS Election Officer, Vaishali Block, District- Vaishali.

9.

The Branch Manager, the Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Branch- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. 10.

Neeraj Kumar Singh @ Sonu Singh S/o Sri Shambhu Sharan Singh, Resident of Village- Parmanandpur, P.O.- Balukara, P.S. and Block- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent no.9 :

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate For the Election Authority:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, AC to SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.9, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the Bihar State Election Authority and Mr. Akash

Patna High Court CWJC No.1702 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 Chaturvedi, learned AC to SC-11 appearing on behalf of the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U