Pundev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3617 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Pundev Yadav Son of Khelaman Yadav Resident of Village - Mahmanna, P.S.- Tekari and Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Tekari P.S. Case No. 199 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 504, 506 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioner along with co-accused is alleged to have fired upon the informant which hit at the arm and head. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case. Till date, no injury report has been brought on record. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-named in the event of his arrest/surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3617 of 2020(2) dt.29-02-2020 2/2 court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 199 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T