Dr. Ram Chandra Prasad Singh v. The Magadh University

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2138 of 2020 ====================================================== Dr. Ram Chandra Prasad Singh Son of Late Kishun Prasad Resident of Mohalla- S.N. Sinha College Road Jehanabad, West of Railway Station, New Teni Bigha, P.s. and District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Magadh University Bodh-Gaya through the Vice Chancellor 2.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, District- Gaya 3.

The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, District- Gaya 4.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, District- Gaya 5.

The Principal , S.S. College, Jahanabad 6.

The Principal, Sri Arbind Mahila College, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Adv.

Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmad, Adv.

Mr. Akshansh Ankit, Adv.

Mr. Harsh Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

By filing the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent Authority to make the payment of arrears of difference Rs. 7,47,195/- of S.S. College, Jehanabad and Rs. 4,07,148/- of Sri Arvind Mahila College, Patna.

(ii) For issuance of such other appropriate

Patna High Court CWJC No.2138 of 2020 dt.29-07-2024 2/2 writ/order/direction, which may deem fit and proper.

3.

Considering the prayers made in the writ petition, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya (respondent no.4) within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The respondent no. 4 is well-advised to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of any such representation filed by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his counsel. 4.

It is made clear that the respondent no.4 shall be held responsible for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 31.07.2024 Transmission Date NA