← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1188/2021allowed

Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-28Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1188 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Umesh Yadav Son of Sri Harishankar Yadav Resident of VillageBargachhaiya, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Usha Kumari, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-06-2021 Heard the parties in virtual Court proceeding. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 02.11.2020 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST Act), West Champaran, Bettiah, in B.P. No. 2928 of 2020, arising out of Bairiya P.S. Case No. 337 of 2020 registered under Sections 341/323/307/224/353/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Considering the nature of allegation and lack of material to substantiate the allegation as well as completion of investigation, let the appellant, above named, be released on

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1188 of 2021(4) dt.28-06-2021 2/2 bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the appellant.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T