← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1927/2019dismiss for nonprosecution

Ram Babu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-24Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1927 of 2019 ====================================================== Ram Babu, S/o Ram Naumi Ram, Resident of Village- Dighwalia, P.SRaghunathpur, District- siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Bihar, Patna 4.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga-cum Enquiry Officer Bihar 5.

The Joint Secretary, General and Administration Department, Bihar, Patna 6.

The Officer on Special Duty, General Administration Department Bihar, Patna 7.

The Deputy Secretary, General and Administration Department Bihar, Patna 8.

The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna 9.

The Under Secretary, General and Administration Department Bihar, Patna 10.

The Under Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna 11.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani, District-Madhubani 12.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani 13.

The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 For the BPSC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-10-2024 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the BPSC are present.

3. Earlier also, when the matter was taken up on 09.07.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1927 of 2019(4) dt.24-10-2024 2/2 petitioner.

4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents no. 2, 5, 6, 7 and 9, the copy of which has duly been served upon the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, there is no response to the counter affidavit.

5. Be that as it may, considering the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U